Learning
from the Experiences of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HCBUs)
John
Hoover
On October 9 I attended a conference in St. Paul entitled Learning and teaching with fire and
subtitled Lessons from HCBUs & tribal
colleges. The conference was jointly sponsored by Grotto, Target, General
Mills, the Cargill Foundation, the United Negro College Fund, the African
American Leadership Forum, MIGIZI Communications, St. Paul Indians in Action,
and the Center for School Change. The latter organization organized the
conference, held at the Wellstone Center in St. Paul.
While all of the conference presentations were excellently
informative, in this posting I want to stress the factors from HCBUs that
statistically related to the success of African American students from low SES
backgrounds. Among these young people, the historically-black universities
succeed at rates higher than all other types of institutions except for the
most prestigious universities (e.g., Yale, Princeton, Harvard, Cal et
al.).
I wanted to take the approach of pulling apart these
findings because both of the morning speakers persuasively argued that there
are lessons to be learned from their experiences with implications for
secondary and post-secondary schools in Minnesota. I have organized the remainder
of the blog entry as a table, with a brief statement of the main points
occupying a column, an expansion of the topic in the middle, and references at
the end that readers might find useful in their own readings.
The information in this posting was provided by the
following experts:
·
Dr. Brian
K. Bridges, Vice President of Researcher, and Member Engagement
Coordinator, United Negro College Fund
Table 1. Findings re HCBUs with implications for SCSU and
partner districts.
Finding
|
Expansion on Principles
|
References & Resources
|
HCBUs are extremely successful at retaining African
American students
|
When one controls for SES and high school quality
indicators, HCBUs are as successfully retain and graduate African American
students, particularly Black males, at rates higher than nearly all other
U.S. Institutions. This is true especially in STEM domains; enrolling only
about 20% of AA college students, they issue 16% of baccalaureate degrees,
while producing 40% of STEM degrees; they train about half of Black teachers,
and are among the top 20% of American institutions at sending students on to
STEM advanced degrees.
|
|
Finding
|
Expansion on Principles/ Implication
for SCSU and the Partnership
|
References & Resources
|
Relationships, relationships, & more relationships
|
Research has shown that at HCBUs higher rates and
intensities of student-faculty interactions and mentoring occur. These
differences have been shown to correspond to the decisions of students to
remain in college and to complete degrees. HCBUs hire faculty members with
very high expectations regarding the time that they will spend individually
with students.
|
|
Employ intrusive or protective advising
|
Bridges demonstrated that faculty members participate in
what might be called intrusive advising, taking personal responsibility for
the success of individual students. While appreciative advising is clearly
goal-directed, it also extends to personal relationships with students.
Faculty members “intrude” into advisees personal lives more frequently and
more intensely than is true at traditional universities. This practice is
associated with candidate success.
|
|
Promotion of engagement based on culture
|
Faculty members at HCBUs are expected to remain aware of
African American culture and to bring this knowledge differentially to bear
on instruction and advising (see intrusive advising above). Several examples
from secondary schools could be benchmarked by partner districts including
Chicago’s Urban Preparatory Academies, and Knowledge is Power Programs, both
of which have successfully build programs around African American cultural
patterns. Another often-repeated phrase regarding planning with cultures was
“do with us, not to us.” One suspected reason for the relative success of
HCBUs was that they build environments where African American students feel
supported and comfortable. Can traditional secondary schools and
post-secondary institutions create these structures? Both speakers thought
this possible—by benchmarking the HCBU practices!
|
|
Moving up by setting high standards and goals
|
Programs demonstrating the most success with African
American boys stress goal setting. For HCBUs, this means expressing frequent
and intense expectations for attending graduate school. For secondary
schools, this means the same: the communication of intense expectations for
college attendance and preparing students and parents by systematically passing
along “college knowledge.” Research has shown that high expectations and goal
setting for the future produce increments in current performance among all
students. Both speakers stressed that better preparation for college is a
need in urban high schools in the U.S. This means, for example, more
enrollment in college preparatory courses, advanced placement, international
baccalaureate, and foreign language courses.
|
|
STOP using STEM courses to weed out students RIGHT NOW
|
Professors at HCBUs do not see mathematics and science
courses as ways to weed out students, while Toldson argued that at many
traditional universities STEM courses are seen as excessively difficult and
as ways to weed students out of high-prestige fields. This has to end if we
want to retain students from low SES backgrounds. Since students from HCBUs
succeed in graduate schools, this approach has worked. Better teaching and
more support, better teaching and more support, better teaching and more
support!!!
|
General
comments on STEM: Energy
department HCBU partnership
|
Anyone with an interest in expanding on this conversation,
please let me know!
No comments:
Post a Comment